Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
652 A.2d 294
Opinion
ORDER
The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer, 652 A.2d 294 (Pa. 1994).
652 A.2d 294 (Commonwealth v. Schaeffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Dunnavant, G.
107 A.3d 29 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Darush
740 A.2d 722 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Commonwealth v. Alexander
708 A.2d 1251 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Commonwealth v. Fowler
703 A.2d 1027 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Johnson
688 A.2d 205 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Fowler
670 A.2d 153 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Commonwealth v. Metts
669 A.2d 346 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. DeBlase
665 A.2d 427 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Reiss
655 A.2d 163 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Bannister
656 A.2d 129 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)