Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
652 A.2d 294
This text of 652 A.2d 294 (Commonwealth v. Schaeffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer, 652 A.2d 294 (Pa. 1994).
Opinion
[295]*295 ORDER
The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the decision of these eases.
NIX, C.J., and PAPADAKOS and CASTILLE, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
652 A.2d 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-schaeffer-pa-1994.