Commonwealth v. Schaeffer

652 A.2d 294
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.*

FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Schaeffer, 652 A.2d 294 (Pa. 1994).

652 A.2d 294 (Commonwealth v. Schaeffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Dunnavant, G.
107 A.3d 29 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Darush
740 A.2d 722 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1999)
Commonwealth v. Alexander
708 A.2d 1251 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Commonwealth v. Fowler
703 A.2d 1027 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Johnson
688 A.2d 205 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Fowler
670 A.2d 153 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Commonwealth v. Metts
669 A.2d 346 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. DeBlase
665 A.2d 427 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Reiss
655 A.2d 163 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Commonwealth v. Bannister
656 A.2d 129 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)