Com. v. Redanauer, R.

2024 Pa. Super. 243

• Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: October 22, 2024
• Docket: 1631 EDA 2021
• Status: Published

Opinion

J-E02002-23

2024 PA Super 243

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : : : ROBERT REDANAUER : No. 1631 EDA 2021

Appeal from the Order Entered July 15, 2021 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): MC-51-CR-0007444-2021, MC-51-CR-0007445-2021

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : : : ROBERT REDANAUER : No. 1632 EDA 2021

Appeal from the Order Entered July 15, 2021 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): MC-51-CR-0007444-2021, MC-51-CR-0007445-2021

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., BOWES, J., OLSON, J., DUBOW, J., KUNSELMAN, J., MURRAY, J., McLAUGHLIN, J., KING, J., and McCAFFERY, J.

OPINION BY McLAUGHLIN, J.: FILED OCTOBER 22, 2024

This case returns to us following remand from the Pennsylvania

Supreme Court after the Commonwealth’s petition for allowance of appeal

from this Court’s quashal of its appeal. In adherence to the direction of our

Supreme Court, we reverse and remand with instructions. See J-E02002-23

Commonwealth v. Redanauer, ___ A.3d ___, 2024 WL 3248685 (Pa. filed

July 1, 2024) (per curiam order).

The Commonwealth charged Redanauer with four misdemeanors:

simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, possessing

instruments of crime, and terroristic threats. It alleged that Redanauer had

committed each of these offenses against two individuals, Daniel Taylor and

his brother, A.T. The criminal complaint alleged that, on or about December

27, 2020, Redanauer “attempted to put Daniel Taylor and [A.T.] in fear of

imminent bodily danger by pointing a firearm in their faces and saying, ‘I’m

going to shoot you fucker’ as he walked towards them.” Criminal Complaint,

DC # 20-08-039365. The charges were docketed at two separate dockets,

7444-2021 (“Docket 7444”) for the minor victim, and 7445-2021 (“Docket

7445”) for Daniel Taylor. See PARS Report, Docket 7444; PARS Report,

Docket 7445. Both cases were scheduled for trial in Philadelphia Municipal

Court.

Pursuant to a request from the Commonwealth, the court listed Docket

7444 for a preliminary hearing in Common Pleas Court. See Order, filed

6/14/21, Docket 7444 (“This matter, currently listed for a trial on July 15,

2021, . . . shall be scheduled for a preliminary hearing . . . on July 15, 2021”);

Certification, filed 6/9/21. Docket 7445 remained scheduled for trial.

Both matters proceeded on July 15, 2021, before a single Common Pleas

Court judge. The Commonwealth’s only witness was Daniel Taylor, the victim

-2- J-E02002-23

at Docket 7445. The trial court noted, “We are at a preliminary hearing.” N.T.,

Preliminary Hearing, 7/15/21, at 9-10.

During argument, defense counsel argued that since the Commonwealth

only certified docket 7444-2021 for a preliminary hearing, the court should

find Redanauer not guilty on the remaining docket associated with Taylor. Id.

at 26. He argued that since the Commonwealth did not file a certification of a

jury trial for Docket 7445, it remained a trial and therefore the Commonwealth

did not meet its burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 27.

He then argued that if the court found Redanauer not guilty at docket 7445,

then “jeopardy is attached and prosecution is barred on [7]444.” Id.

The Commonwealth argued that joinder was automatic and therefore

when it filed a certification at Docket 7444 it included Docket 7445. Id. at 29.

It also argued that a trial never commenced because “the defense did not

waive arraignment and enter a plea of not guilty[.]” Id.

The court determined that at Docket 7444, the Commonwealth failed to

establish a prima facie case. See id. at 31 (court stating “a prima facie case

was never established” at Docket 7444); Trial Disposition and Dismissal Form,

Docket 7444. It also found Redanauer was not guilty as to docket 7444,

“because double jeopardy, which attached when the trial was held 7445-

2021.” N.T., Preliminary Hearing at 32.; Disposition and Dismissal Form,

Docket 7445.

The Commonwealth appealed to this Court, alleging that the trial court

erred by treating the preliminary hearing at Docket 7445 as a trial. We

-3- J-E02002-23

quashed the appeal, finding that the Commonwealth could not appeal from a

not guilty verdict. See Commonwealth v. Redanauer, 307 A.3d 767

(Pa.Super. 2023) (en banc). The Commonwealth filed a petition for allowance

of appeal, which our Supreme Court granted. On July 1, 2024, our Supreme

Court reversed this Court’s decision as to both dockets and remanded to this

Court with instructions “to remand to the Court of Common Pleas to determine

whether the Commonwealth established a prima facie case on MC-51-CR-

0007445-2021.” Redanauer, ___ A.3d ____, 2024 WL 3248685, at *1.

In line with this instruction, we vacate the order of the trial court and

remand this case for the Court of Common Pleas to determine whether the

Commonwealth established a prima facie case at Docket 7445. See N.T. at 9-

10 (“We are at a preliminary hearing.”); Commonwealth v. Hetherington,

331 A.2d 205, 208 (Pa. 1975) (“[a] finding . . . that the Commonwealth has

failed to establish a prima facie case is not a final determination, such as an

acquittal, and only entitles the accused to his liberty for the present, leaving

him subject to rearrest”); Commonwealth v. Bronson, 393 A.2d 453, 454

(Pa. 1978) (“claim of double jeopardy must fail if . . . jeopardy never

attached”). We do not at this juncture address Docket 7444, in conformity

with the specific instructions of our Supreme Court. We leave the disposition

of that docket in the first instance to the trial court, with the benefit of

advocacy from the parties.

Order vacated. Case remanded with instructions. Jurisdiction

relinquished.

-4- J-E02002-23

President Judge Panella, Judge Dubow, Judge Kunselman and Judge

Murray join the Opinion.

Judge Bowes files a Concurring/Dissenting Opinion in which Judge Olson

and Judge King join.

Judge McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of

this Opinion.

Date: 10/22/2024

-5-