Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority

S.D. Ohio

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority

DecidedJanuary 27, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-04230

StatusUnknown

This text of Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority (Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority, (S.D. Ohio 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COLUMBUS CENTRAL OHIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-4230 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) Soon after Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and render pending motions to dismiss the original complaint moot. Green v. Mason, 504 F. Supp. 3d 813, 826 (S.D. Ohio 2020) (Cole, J.) (citing Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir.2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading). Arguments raised by Defendants in the Motion to Dismiss will more appropriately be resolved through a subsequent motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding the operative Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as MOOT. This case remains open. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1/27/2025 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COLUMBUS CENTRAL OHIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-4230 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) Soon after Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and render pending motions to dismiss the original complaint moot. Green v. Mason, 504 F. Supp. 3d 813, 826 (S.D. Ohio 2020) (Cole, J.) (citing Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir.2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading). Arguments raised by Defendants in the Motion to Dismiss will more appropriately be resolved through a subsequent motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding the operative Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as MOOT. This case remains open. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1/27/2025 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-central-ohio-building-and-construction-trades-council-afl-cio-v-ohsd-2025.