Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority

S.D. Ohio

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided January 27, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-04230·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COLUMBUS CENTRAL OHIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-4230 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) Soon after Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and render pending motions to dismiss the original complaint moot. Green v. Mason, 504 F. Supp. 3d 813, 826 (S.D. Ohio 2020) (Cole, J.) (citing Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir.2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading). Arguments raised by Defendants in the Motion to Dismiss will more appropriately be resolved through a subsequent motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding the operative Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as MOOT. This case remains open. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1/27/2025 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

COLUMBUS CENTRAL OHIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-4230 v. JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson COLUMBUS REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (ECF No. 11.) Soon after Defendants filed the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Amended complaints supersede the original pleadings and render pending motions to dismiss the original complaint moot. Green v. Mason, 504 F. Supp. 3d 813, 826 (S.D. Ohio 2020) (Cole, J.) (citing Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir.2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading). Arguments raised by Defendants in the Motion to Dismiss will more appropriately be resolved through a subsequent motion to dismiss or motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding the operative Amended Complaint. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as MOOT. This case remains open. IT IS SO ORDERED.

1/27/2025 s/Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. DATE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority, (S.D. Ohio 2025).

Pincite

Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority (Columbus Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Columbus Regional Airport Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.