Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wolfrom

697 N.E.2d 593, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 12, 1998·No. No. 97-2634·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Respondent is further ordered to make restitution for the unearned funds received from Griffith, Thompson, and Súber with statutory interest, and bring his child support obligations current with statutory interest and remain in compliance with those obligations. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wolfrom, 697 N.E.2d 593, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 1998).

697 N.E.2d 593 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wolfrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Slayman, 08ca70 (12-18-2008)
2008 Ohio 6713 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Farmer
855 N.E.2d 462 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfrom
1998 Ohio 418 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)