Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ross
846 N.E.2d 858, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1429
Opinion
This matter came on for further consideration upon the filing of a motion by respondent for extension of time to pay costs. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ross, 846 N.E.2d 858, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2006).
846 N.E.2d 858 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisler
34 N.E.3d 99 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)