Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols

Ohio Supreme Court

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols

2001 Ohio 105, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1201

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 2001

Docket1990-1705

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 105 (Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols, 2001 Ohio 105, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 1201.]

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. NICHOLS. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols, 2001-Ohio-105.] (No. 90-1705—Submitted and decided May 17, 2001.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent LeRoy Alvin Nichols, Attorney Registration No. 0015743, last known address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 1991, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, stayed the suspension and placed respondent on probation for a period of two years, and its orders of September 14, 1994, and November 17, 1994, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(9), revoked respondent’s probation and reinstated his one-year suspension, finds that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that LeRoy Alvin Nichols be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For earlier cases, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1990), 61 Ohio St.3d 546, 575 N.E.2d 799; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 1486, 581 N.E.2d 1391; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 1422, 598 N.E.2d 1172; Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 54, 607 N.E.2d 1068; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1444, 639 N.E.2d 112; Columbus Bar Assn. v. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Nichols (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 1410, 641 N.E.2d 1108; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 1202, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 1201.]

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. NICHOLS. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols, 2001-Ohio-105.] (No. 90-1705—Submitted and decided May 17, 2001.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent LeRoy Alvin Nichols, Attorney Registration No. 0015743, last known address in Columbus, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 1991, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, stayed the suspension and placed respondent on probation for a period of two years, and its orders of September 14, 1994, and November 17, 1994, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(9), revoked respondent’s probation and reinstated his one-year suspension, finds that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that LeRoy Alvin Nichols be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For earlier cases, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1990), 61 Ohio St.3d 546, 575 N.E.2d 799; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 1486, 581 N.E.2d 1391; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 1422, 598 N.E.2d 1172; Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 54, 607 N.E.2d 1068; Columbus Bar Assn. v. Nichols (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1444, 639 N.E.2d 112; Columbus Bar Assn. v. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Nichols (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 1410, 641 N.E.2d 1108; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Nichols (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 1202, ___ N.E.2d ___. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 105, 92 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-nichols-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack