Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell

520 N.E.2d 226, 35 Ohio St. 3d 258, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 59
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1988
DocketD.D. No. 87-14
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 520 N.E.2d 226 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell, 520 N.E.2d 226, 35 Ohio St. 3d 258, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 59 (Ohio 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. Respondent’s conduct, particularly with respect to Count I, however, requires a more severe sanction than that recommended. Such conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial system. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.
2018 Ohio 5091 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko
2012 Ohio 5694 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stafford
2012 Ohio 909 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner
793 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. West
706 N.E.2d 760 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Hartwell
539 N.E.2d 608 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 N.E.2d 226, 35 Ohio St. 3d 258, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/columbus-bar-assn-v-hartwell-ohio-1988.