Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Bunge

646 N.E.2d 1106, 71 Ohio St. 3d 649

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the arguments and stipulations in this case and concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(4) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-101(A)(l), (2), and (3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We also agree with the recommended sanction. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.