Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship

660 N.E.2d 1141, 74 Ohio St. 3d 586
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-1200·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Relator’s complaint was served upon respondent in October 1994, but respondent did not interpose a response until July 31, 1995, and then only at the last moment before us. As relator points out, “To allow the [590] Respondent to ignore * * * these proceedings and now to blithely suggest — ten months * * * [later] — that the process begin again, would be to totally disregard the public and professional obligations of the disciplinary system.” Moreover, respondent has repeatedly failed to perform legal services for which he accepted responsibility, misused client funds, and compromised his clients’ legal interests.

Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents and would disbar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship, 660 N.E.2d 1141, 74 Ohio St. 3d 586 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 1141 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Blankenship
1999 Ohio 397 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser
1997 Ohio 161 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Lieser
683 N.E.2d 1148 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)