Colter v. Office of the State's Attorney

Fourth Circuit

Colter v. Office of the State's Attorney

30 F. App'x 316

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 21, 2002

DocketNos. 02-6125, 02-6124

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 F. App'x 316 (Colter v. Office of the State's Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colter v. Office of the State's Attorney, 30 F. App'x 316 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Perry L. Colter appeals the district court’s order (1) [317]*317denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6124); and (2) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6125). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals in both Nos. 02-6124 and 02-6125 on the reasoning of the district court. See Colter v. United States, Nos. CA-01-1327-CCB; CR-95-405-CCB; CA-99-3752 (D. Md. filed Dec. 28, 2001; entered Dec. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Perry L. Colter appeals the district court’s order (1) [317]*317denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6124); and (2) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) (No. 02-6125). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals in both Nos. 02-6124 and 02-6125 on the reasoning of the district court. See Colter v. United States, Nos. CA-01-1327-CCB; CR-95-405-CCB; CA-99-3752 (D. Md. filed Dec. 28, 2001; entered Dec. 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. App'x 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colter-v-office-of-the-states-attorney-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack