Colter v. Office of State's Attorney

Fourth Circuit

Colter v. Office of State's Attorney

40 F. App'x 757

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 2002

Docket02-6233

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 F. App'x 757 (Colter v. Office of State's Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colter v. Office of State's Attorney, 40 F. App'x 757 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Perry L. Colter seeks to appeal the district court’s order (1) denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001); and (2) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). Colter has already filed two prior appeals from this same district court order, and now seeks to raise the identical claims that he raised in the previous appeals. Because we have already considered and dismissed these [758]*758claims with regard to the same order in the prior appeals, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See Colter v. Office of the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, No. 02-6124(L), 2002 WL 440394, 30 Fed.Appx. 316 (4th Cir. Mar.21, 2002) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Perry L. Colter seeks to appeal the district court’s order (1) denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001); and (2) denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). Colter has already filed two prior appeals from this same district court order, and now seeks to raise the identical claims that he raised in the previous appeals. Because we have already considered and dismissed these [758]*758claims with regard to the same order in the prior appeals, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See Colter v. Office of the State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, No. 02-6124(L), 2002 WL 440394, 30 Fed.Appx. 316 (4th Cir. Mar.21, 2002) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 F. App'x 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colter-v-office-of-states-attorney-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack