Colon v. State
595 So. 2d 306, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3769, 1992 WL 55281
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 586 So. 2d 1305 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a 3.850 motion in the trial court as to the inefficiency of the trial counsel. See Kelley v. State, 486 So.2d 578 (Fla.1986) cert. denied 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986); Perri v. State, 441 So.2d 606 (Fla.1983); Gibson v. State, 351 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977) cert. denied 435 U.S. 1004, 98 S.Ct. 1660, 56 L.Ed.2d 93 (1978); Hammer v. State, 543 So.2d 437 (Fla.2d DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colon v. State, 595 So. 2d 306, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3769, 1992 WL 55281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
595 So. 2d 306 (Colon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
David W. McKay v. Texas
479 U.S. 871 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Gibson v. State
351 So. 2d 948 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Perri v. State
441 So. 2d 606 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Kelley v. State
486 So. 2d 578 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Hammer v. State
543 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)