Home/Supreme Court/David W. McKay v. Texas

David W. McKay v. Texas

479 U.S. 871, 107 S. Ct. 239
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 6, 1986
Docket85-6831
StatusPublished
Cited by753 cases

This text of 479 U.S. 871 (David W. McKay v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David W. McKay v. Texas, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S. Ct. 239 (1986).

Opinion

479 U.S. 871

107 S.Ct. 239

93 L.Ed.2d 164

David W. McKAY, petitioner,
v.
TEXAS

No. 85-6831

Supreme Court of the United States

October 6, 1986

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Denied.

Justice BRENNAN and Justice MARSHALL dissenting:

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Justice SCALIA took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aaron Amberson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
State v. Bedford
702 S.E.2d 522 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Waring
701 S.E.2d 615 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)
Jones v. Bradshaw
489 F. Supp. 2d 786 (N.D. Ohio, 2007)
State v. Palmer
622 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Dickerson v. Mitchell
336 F. Supp. 2d 770 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
State v. Hooker
600 S.E.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Jones
566 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Mills v. Commonwealth
996 S.W.2d 473 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1999)
Scott v. Anderson
58 F. Supp. 2d 767 (N.D. Ohio, 1998)
Bolden v. State
967 S.W.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Jarvis v. Commonwealth
960 S.W.2d 466 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1998)
Davila v. State
952 S.W.2d 872 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Coffey v. Messer
945 S.W.2d 944 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1997)
Crump v. Warden
934 P.2d 247 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1997)
Cabrales v. State
932 S.W.2d 653 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
United States v. Nguyen
928 F. Supp. 1525 (D. Kansas, 1996)
State v. Hart
905 S.W.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Huff v. State
897 S.W.2d 829 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
De La Garza v. State
898 S.W.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 U.S. 871, 107 S. Ct. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-w-mckay-v-texas-scotus-1986.