Colon v. State
283 So. 2d 127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Colon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 284 So. 2d 405 →
Opinion
Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colon v. State, 283 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
283 So. 2d 127 (Colon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lietch v. State
248 So. 2d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Moody v. State
279 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)