Colon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Colon v. State

283 So. 2d 127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 25, 1973

DocketNo. 72-928

StatusPublished

This text of 283 So. 2d 127 (Colon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colon v. State, 283 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 So. 2d 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colon-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack