Collins v. State
843 So. 2d 985, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 2003 WL 1971764
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 800 So. 2d 660 →
Opinion
The trial court’s written order of revocation of probation did not conform to its oral ruling. The written order found appellant guilty of a violation for committing the crime of robbery. The court’s oral ruling was that appellant had violated his probation by committing the lesser included crime of petit theft. We remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order to conform with the court’s oral pronouncement. See Rodriguez v. State, 777 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Collins v. State, 843 So. 2d 985, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6134, 2003 WL 1971764 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
843 So. 2d 985 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rodriguez v. State
777 So. 2d 1175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)