Collins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Collins v. State

754 So. 2d 140, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3423, 2000 WL 294524

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 2000

DocketNo. 4D98-3558

StatusPublished

This text of 754 So. 2d 140 (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. State, 754 So. 2d 140, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3423, 2000 WL 294524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct sentence in which appellant argued that his sentence is unconstitutional because the law which provided enhanced sentencing for violent career criminals, Ch. 95-182, §§ 1-7, 12, Laws of Fla. (1995), violated the single-subject rule. We remand for reconsideration in light of State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999).

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct sentence in which appellant argued that his sentence is unconstitutional because the law which provided enhanced sentencing for violent career criminals, Ch. 95-182, §§ 1-7, 12, Laws of Fla. (1995), violated the single-subject rule. We remand for reconsideration in light of State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999).

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 So. 2d 140, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3423, 2000 WL 294524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack