Collins v. State
This text of Collins v. State (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JASON J. COLLINS, § § No. 17, 2019 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID Nos. 1708012957 (K) Plaintiff Below- § 1708015150 Appellee. §
Submitted: February 27, 2019 Decided: March 15, 2019
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s
motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The defendant-appellant, Jason Collins, filed this appeal from
the Superior Court’s order denying his motion for review of sentence.1 The
State has moved to affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the ground that
it is manifest on the face of Collins’ opening brief that his appeal is without
merit. We agree and affirm.
(2) The record reflects that Collins pleaded guilty on July 25, 2018,
to one count of drug dealing and one count of issuing a bad check in excess
1 On March 8, 2019, Collins filed a motion for expedited procedure under Supreme Court Rule 25(e). The issuance of this decision renders the Rule 25(e) motion moot. of $1,500. On the drug dealing charge, the Superior Court sentenced Collins
to ten years of Level V incarceration, suspended for twelve months of Level
IV home confinement, followed by one year on Level III probation. On the
bad check charge, the Superior Court sentenced him to two years of Level V
incarceration, suspended for one year on Level III probation.
(3) Collins later absconded from probation. An administrative
warrant was obtained and the Superior Court held a violation of probation
(“VOP”) hearing on October 15, 2018. The Superior Court found Collins
violated his probation for his drug dealing and bad check convictions.
Contemporaneously, the Superior Court also found Collins had violated his
probation for two earlier felony convictions: a 2009 conviction for second
degree forgery and a 2014 conviction for identity theft. For his 2009 second
degree forgery conviction, Collins was serving a sentence of two years of
Level V incarceration, suspended for six months on Level II probation, to be
followed by one year on Level I probation for restitution purposes only.
Collins was also serving a sentence of two years of Level V of incarceration,
suspended for six months on Level II probation, to be followed by one year
on Level I probation for restitution purposes only for his 2014 identity theft
conviction. At the VOP hearing, the Superior Court resentenced Collins as
follows: (i) on the VOP for the drug dealing conviction, ten years of Level V
incarceration with credit for nine days previously served, suspended after six
2 months of Level V incarceration, followed by six months of Level IV work
release, followed by one year on Level III probation; (ii) on the VOP for the
forgery conviction, one year of Level V incarceration, suspended for one
year on Level III probation; (iii) on the VOP for the identity theft conviction,
one year and six months of Level V incarceration, suspended for one year on
Level III probation; and (iv) for the VOP on the bad check conviction, two
years of Level V incarceration, suspended for one year on Level III
probation.
(4) Collins filed a motion for review of sentence with the Superior
Court on December 7, 2018, seeking six months of Level V credit time and
requesting that the Level IV work release portion of his sentence be
modified to Level III probation. The Superior Court denied Collins’ motion,
concluding that Level IV work release was an appropriate placement for
Collins in light of his criminal history. Further, after reviewing a report
prepared by the Investigative Services Office, the Superior Court found
Collins had, in fact, received credit for the time he had previously served at
Level V. This appeal followed.
(5) The Court has reviewed the parties’ contentions and the record
carefully. The Court finds no factual or legal basis to Collins’ contentions.
Collins correctly asserts that he is entitled to Level V credit for Level V time
3 served.2 However, Collins argues the Superior Court improperly credited
his Level V time to a “non Level V sentence.” This allegation is false. At
the time of the October 15, 2018 VOP hearing, Collins was serving a
sentence for two years of Level V incarceration, suspended for six months
on Level IV probation, to be followed by one year on Level I probation for
restitution purposes for his 2014 conviction for identity theft. In its VOP
sentence, the Superior Court deducted six months of Level V time from the
two years of backup time Collins faced on this conviction. Collins continues
to face a suspended Level V sentence for one year and six months for his
conviction of identity theft. Stated differently, the six months of pretrial
Level V time Collins served prior to posting bond on his drug dealing charge
has been credited to the balance of Level V time Collins faces. Accordingly,
we find no error in the Superior Court’s denial of Collins’ motion to review
his sentence.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the
Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice
2 Gamble v. State, 728 A.2d 1171, 1172 (Del. 1999).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-del-2019.