Collins v. State
This text of Collins v. State (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JASON J. COLLINS, § § No. 209, 2015 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID. No. 0904002027 Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 12, 2015 Decided: January 6, 2016
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, and SEITZ, Justices.
ORDER
This 6th day of January 2016, upon consideration of the notice to show
cause and the response and reply thereto, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Jason Collins, filed this appeal from the Superior
Court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence. Collins argued below
and on appeal that he is entitled to more credit time against the Level V portion of
his sixth violation of probation sentence. While the appeal was pending, Collins
completed the Level V portion of his sentence and was released from custody. The
Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Collins to show cause why the appeal should
be dismissed because the issue on appeal is now moot. (2) Collins filed a response arguing that the issue of his entitlement to
Level V credit time is not moot because he is still serving Level I probation, and he
might violate his probation again and potentially be subject to more Level V
incarceration. The State asserts that the issue of Level V credit time is moot.
(3) After careful consideration, the Court concludes that Collins’ release
from Level V custody has rendered his request for Level V credit time moot.1 Any
decision on Collins’ request for credit time would amount to an impermissible
advisory opinion and would be a waste of scarce judicial resources.2 If Collins
should violate his probation for a seventh time, he can raise the issue of his
entitlement to Level V credit with the Superior Court before any future VOP
sentencing.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED as moot.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
1 Ewell v. State, 2011 WL 1716455 (Del. May 5, 2011). 2 Sannini v. Casscells, 401 A.2d 927, 930 (Del. 1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-del-2016.