Collins v. AutoZone, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 7, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00316·Unknown

Opinion

1 | HONE LAW Jill Garcia, NV Bar No. 7805 2 jgarcia@hone.law Amy L. Howard, NV Bar No. 13946 3 || ahoward@hone.law Kathryn C. Newman, NV Bar No. 13733 4 ||knewman@hone.law 701 N. Green Valley Parkway, Suite 200 5 || Henderson, NV 89074 Phone 702-608-3720 6||Fax 702-608-7814 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Eric Collins 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ERIC COLLINS, an individual, Case No. 2:22-cv-00316-CDS-BNW 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 | AUTOZONE, INC., a Nevada corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE 15 |] BUSINESS ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order 20 || Concerning Confidential Information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Being 21|\fully appraised of the premises, the Court orders the following: 22 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action may involve the production of confidential, proprietary, or 24 | private information for which special treatment may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties 25 hereby stipulate to entry of the following Protective Order. It does not confer blanket protection 26 ||on all disclosures or responses to discovery. This Order does not apply retroactively to any 27 || documents produced prior to entry of this Order whether those documents were disclosed by 28 Plaintiff or Defendant. The protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to

] || the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 2 legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information 3 || under seal. 4 | II. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL 5 “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things 6 || produced or otherwise exchanged: records reflecting medical conditions or treatments of any 7\|current or former employees of Defendant, including Plaintiff; certain documents contained in 8 || the personnel records of persons who are not parties to this lawsuit; financial and proprietary 9 || documents of Defendant and financial and proprietary documents of Plaintiff not in the public 10 |] domain or subject to public disclosure; and investigation files into situations involving 11 |}employees or former employees of Defendant, not parties to this action and not involving 12 Plaintiff. 13 The parties will meet and confer as to any other documents, or class of documents which 14 party believes should be designated as “Confidential” to attempt to reach a consensus as to 15 || further stipulation. 01. Scope 17 The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as 18 || defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) 19 jlall copies, excerpts, summaries or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, 20 || conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. 21 || However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the 22 || public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. 23}1V. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 24 A. Basic Principles. 25 A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another 26 || party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or 27 || attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories 28 lof persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be

1 ||stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that 2 access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. 3 B. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Material. 4 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a 5 receiving party may disclose confidential material only to: 6 1. Attorneys actively working on this case; 7 2. Persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the 8 || case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial or at other 9 || proceedings in this case; 10 3. The parties, including designated representatives for the Defendant; 11 4. Expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the 12 extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case; 13 5. The Court and its employees (“Court Personnel”); 14 6. Stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the 15 || conduct of this action; 16 7. Deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; and 17 8. Other persons by written agreement of the parties. 18 }]}C. Filing Confidential Material. 19 It is understood that this agreement will facilitate discovery changes. However, there is a 20 || presumption of public access to judicial files and records, and neither party has made a showing 21 || yet — nor has the Court found — that any specific documents are secret or confidential. The parties 22 || have not provided specific facts supported by declarations or concrete examples to establish that 23 ||a protective order is required to protect any trade secret or other confidential material pursuant to 24 || Rule 26(c) or that disclosure would cause an identifiable and significant harm. 25 If either party seeks to file a confidential document under seal, that party must file a 26 || motion for leave to file under seal and must comply with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ 27 || directives in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). A party 28 seeking to maintain the secrecy of documents attached to nondispositive motions must show

1 || good cause exists to overcome the presumption of public access. /d. at 1179. Moreover, the 2 Court has adopted electronic filing procedures, which constitute the official record of the Court. 3 || If either party files documents under seal, that party must follow the Court’s electronic filing 4|| procedures in accordance with Local Rule Part IA 10-5(b). 5 If the sole ground for a motion for leave to seal is that the opposing party (or non-party) 6 || has designated a document as subject to protection pursuant to the stipulated protective order, the 7|| movant must notify the opposing party (or non-party) at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the 8 || filing of the designated document. The designating party must then make a good faith 9 || determination if the relevant standard for sealing is met. To the extent the designating party does 10 ||not believe the relevant standard for sealing can be met, it shall indicate that the document may 11 be filed publicly no later than four (4) calendar days, excluding court holidays, after receiving 12 ||notice of the intended filing. To the extent the designating party believes the relevant standard 13 || for sealing can be met, it shall provide a declaration supporting that assertion no later than four (4) calendar days, excluding court holidays, after receiving notice of the intended filing. The 15 || filing party shall then attach that declaration to its motion to seal the designated material. If the 16 || designating party fails to provide such a declaration in support of the motion for leave to seal, the 17 || filing party shall file a motion for leave to seal so indicating and the Court may order the 18 || document filed in the public record. 19 In the event of an emergency motion, the above filing procedures shall not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. AutoZone, Inc., (D. Nev. 2022).

Collins v. AutoZone, Inc. (Collins v. AutoZone, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)