Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware

35 S.E. 121, 110 Ga. 307, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 390
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 30, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 121 (Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware, 35 S.E. 121, 110 Ga. 307, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 390 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a document presented as a brief of evidence was in large part made from the original stenographic report of the trial, embracing questions to witnesses and their answers, objections to testimony, and colloquies between court and counsel, by interlining words and by striking out many and large parts of such report; and where when presented it still contained irrelevant matter, was marred, scratched, and imperfect, and showed that there had been no bona fide attempt to brief or condense the evidence as the law requires, it was proper for the trial judge to refuse to approve it as a brief of evidence. Jones v. West View Cemetery, 103 Ga. 560; Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145. It was then proper to dismiss the motion for new trial, and the judge did not err in refusing-to give further time within which to perfect the brief of evidence, an extension of time having beenÉhready granted. Bryant v. Gray, 105 Ga. 483.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. State
88 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.E. 121, 110 Ga. 307, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-park-belt-railroad-v-ware-ga-1900.