Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware

35 S.E. 121, 110 Ga. 307, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 390
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 30, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a document presented as a brief of evidence was in large part made from the original stenographic report of the trial, embracing questions to witnesses and their answers, objections to testimony, and colloquies between court and counsel, by interlining words and by striking out many and large parts of such report; and where when presented it still contained irrelevant matter, was marred, scratched, and imperfect, and showed that there had been no bona fide attempt to brief or condense the evidence as the law requires, it was proper for the trial judge to refuse to approve it as a brief of evidence. Jones v. West View Cemetery, 103 Ga. 560; Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145. It was then proper to dismiss the motion for new trial, and the judge did not err in refusing-to give further time within which to perfect the brief of evidence, an extension of time having beenÉhready granted. Bryant v. Gray, 105 Ga. 483.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware, 35 S.E. 121, 110 Ga. 307, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 390 (Ga. 1900).

35 S.E. 121 (Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
88 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)