Bryant v. Gray

30 S.E. 732, 105 Ga. 483, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 583
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1898·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C.' J.

Where under an order of court the movant in a motion for new trial is allowed until a certain day, nearly two months after the date of the filing of the motion, to prepare, file and have approved a brief of evidence, it is not error for the judge, upon the call of the case for hearing, upon the day fixed in his order, to refuse to further extend the time at request of movant to do so because of the failure of the stenographer to transcribe his notes; nor, after such refusal, is it error to dismiss the motion because of a failure to have prepared a brief of evidence in compliance with the order.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. Gray, 30 S.E. 732, 105 Ga. 483, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 583 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 732 (Bryant v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ritchie v. Barker
115 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Vinson v. State
185 S.E. 529 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Starke v. Hunt
115 S.E. 505 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Wiggins v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.
67 S.E. 813 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. Bray & Co.
56 S.E. 513 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Ware
35 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)