Collins Oil Company v. Tenneco, Inc., Tenneco Oil Company
This text of 556 F.2d 1274 (Collins Oil Company v. Tenneco, Inc., Tenneco Oil Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the present Robinson-Patman Act 1 case, the plaintiff appeals the lower court’s granting of a directed verdict at the close of its case on the ground that there was no substantial evidence of any price discrimination between competitors in comparable transactions and no proof of any actual damages. A review of the record reveals that the plaintiff did in fact fail to prove it was in competition with defendant’s more favored customers, and consequently the motion for a directed verdict was properly granted. See M. C. Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Texas Foundries, Inc., 517 F.2d 1059,1066 (5th Cir. 1975).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 F.2d 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-oil-company-v-tenneco-inc-tenneco-oil-company-ca5-1977.