Collier v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2017 Ark. App. 97
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
DocketCV-16-965
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ark. App. 97 (Collier v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collier v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2017 Ark. App. 97 (Ark. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 97

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-16-965

CANDY RENEE COLLIER Opinion Delivered: February 22, 2017 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE HOWARD V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 31JV-15-7-1]

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE TOM COOPER, HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR JUDGE CHILD APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED

RITA W. GRUBER, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from an order terminating Candy Renee Collier’s parental rights to

her son, Z.A.L., born June 15, 2015. Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and

a no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark.

131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(i), setting forth all

adverse rulings from the termination hearing and asserting that there are no issues that would

support a meritorious appeal. The clerk of this court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s

motion and brief to appellant’s last-known address informing her of her right to file pro se

points for reversal. She has filed no points.

After carefully examining the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude that counsel has

complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit

termination cases and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw and affirm the order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 97

Affirmed; motion granted.

KLAPPENBACH and GLOVER, JJ., agree.

The Potter Law Firm, LLP, by: Thomas A. Potter, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
194 S.W.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ark. App. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2017.