Coley v. State
626 So. 2d 1118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11841, 1993 WL 492607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 So. 2d 1017 →
Opinion
Affirmed. § 90.803(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Warren v. State, 498 So.2d 472, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“Generally speaking, an objection is required in these cases in order to preserve for appellate review the propriety of the trial court’s ‘Allen’ charge....”), rev. denied, 503 So.2d 328 (Fla.1987); see also Stephney v. State, 564 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Mitchell v. State, 521 So.2d 185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coley v. State, 626 So. 2d 1118, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11841, 1993 WL 492607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
626 So. 2d 1118 (Coley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stephney v. State
564 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Warren v. State
498 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Mitchell v. State
521 So. 2d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)