Coley v. Altamaha Fertilizer Co.

93 S.E. 90, 147 Ga. 150, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 94
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Eish, C. J.

A judgment against a grantor, obtained after the execution by him of a security deed, but prior to its being filed for record in the county where the land lies, is superior to such deed. Civil Code, §§ 3307, 3320; Cabot v. Armstrong, 100 Ga. 438 (3), 443 (28 S. E. 123); Cambridge Tile Co. v. Scaife & Sons Co., 137 Ga. 281 (2) (73 S. E. 492).

{a) The lien of a judgment being superior to a conveyance by subsequent deed) the provisions of the'Civil Code, § 6038, do not apply. That section relates to the payment of a secured debt by the holder of the judgment (a stranger to the security deed) against'the grantor, before the land can be subjected to the judgment last referred to.

(b) Applying the rule stated to the undisputed facts of this case, the court did not err in directing a verdict finding the land claimed subject to the execution.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coley v. Altamaha Fertilizer Co., 93 S.E. 90, 147 Ga. 150, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 94 (Ga. 1917).

93 S.E. 90 (Coley v. Altamaha Fertilizer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.
137 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Caldwell v. Northwest Atlanta Bank
21 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Saunders v. Citizens First National Bank
142 S.E. 127 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
In re Hammett
286 F. 392 (N.D. Georgia, 1923)
Butler v. LaGrange Grocery Co.
116 S.E. 213 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)