Coleman v. Way
This text of 122 S.E.2d 104 (Coleman v. Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. Where, as in the case sub judice, the father of a minor child has not forfeited his right of custody in any manner provided by law, the mother of the child can not, by an agreement to which the father is not a party, give the child to a third person. Sloan v. Jones, 130 Ga. 836 (62 SE 21); Davis v. Davis, 212 Ga. 217 (91 SE2d 487).
2. It is a well-settled principle of law that the mere failure of a parent to provide support for a minor child who is in the possession or custody of another person, and no- support of the child is requested or needed, is not a failure to provide necessaries, or such abandonment as will amount to' a relinquishment of the right of the parent to- parental custody and control. Brown v. Newsome, 192 Ga. 43 (14 SE2d 470); Rawdin v. Conner, 210 Ga. 508, 512 (81 SE2d 461).
3. Where under the principles herein pronounced, the ordinary hearing the habeas corpus case awards to the mother the custody of the children, it is error for the judge of the superior court to reverse the ordinary’s judgment.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E.2d 104, 217 Ga. 366, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-way-ga-1961.