Coleman v. United States
This text of Coleman v. United States (Coleman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6783
JERMEL ANTHONY COLEMAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-02-69-JHM; CA-05-125-JHM-MFU)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermel Anthony Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. William Frederick Gould, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jermel Coleman appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) and
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Coleman v. United States, Nos. CR-02-
69-JHM; CA-05-125-JHM-MFU (W.D. Va., filed Apr. 20 & entered Apr.
21, 2005; filed May 9 & entered May 10, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coleman v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-united-states-ca4-2005.