Coleman v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Coleman v. United States

160 F. App'x 321

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 05-6783·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jermel Coleman appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. United States, Nos. CR-02-69-JHM; CA-05-125-JHM-MFU (W.D.Va., filed Apr. 20 & entered Apr. 21, 2005; filed May 9 & entered May 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jermel Coleman appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. United States, Nos. CR-02-69-JHM; CA-05-125-JHM-MFU (W.D.Va., filed Apr. 20 & entered Apr. 21, 2005; filed May 9 & entered May 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Coleman v. United States, 160 F. App'x 321 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

160 F. App'x 321 (Coleman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related