Coleman v. Stevenson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. Stevenson. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 F. App'x 709
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2011·No. 10-7102·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7102

RICHARD L. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden; KEISHA TAYLOR, Inmate Grievance Coordinator; JANICE MONTGOMERY, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:09-cv-00872-HMH)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Coleman appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman

v. Stevenson, No. 0:09-cv-00872-HMH (D.S.C. July 26, 2010). We

also deny Coleman’s motions to place the appeal in abeyance, and

for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. Stevenson, (4th Cir. 2011).

Coleman v. Stevenson (Coleman v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related