Coleman v. Stevenson
This text of Coleman v. Stevenson (Coleman v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7102
RICHARD L. COLEMAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden; KEISHA TAYLOR, Inmate Grievance Coordinator; JANICE MONTGOMERY, Inmate Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:09-cv-00872-HMH)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard L. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Coleman appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman
v. Stevenson, No. 0:09-cv-00872-HMH (D.S.C. July 26, 2010). We
also deny Coleman’s motions to place the appeal in abeyance, and
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Coleman v. Stevenson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-stevenson-ca4-2011.