Coleman v. State

1919 OK CR 91, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 82
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 8, 1919·No. No. A-3144.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Lindsey Coleman, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge that he did have in his possession 11 ■ half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $200.

No brief had’ been filed, and no appearance made for the plaintiff in error when the case was called for final submission. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment, for failure to prosecute the appeal. Fo<r this reason the judgment is affirmed, and is remanded to the trial court with direction to enforce its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 1919 OK CR 91, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 82 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

1919 OK CR 91 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pruitt v. State
1920 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1920)