Coleman v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 91 (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, Lindsey Coleman, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge that he did have in his possession 11 ■ half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $200.
No brief had’ been filed, and no appearance made for the plaintiff in error when the case was called for final submission. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment, for failure to prosecute the appeal. Fo<r this reason the judgment is affirmed, and is remanded to the trial court with direction to enforce its judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 91, 179 P. 617, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.