Coleman v. State

243 S.W.3d 490, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1738, 2007 WL 4394462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 648
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2007·No. No. ED 89845·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Coleman (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his request to reopen the Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding. Movant argues that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[491]*491The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 243 S.W.3d 490, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1738, 2007 WL 4394462 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

243 S.W.3d 490 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.