Coleman v. State

238 S.W.3d 708, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433, 2007 WL 2993558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 648
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. ED 88902·Published

Opinion

*709 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travon E. Coleman (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the trial court clearly erred in denying his motion because there was no factual basis for his guilty plea to two counts of first degree assault of a law enforcement officer and two related counts of armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 238 S.W.3d 708, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1433, 2007 WL 2993558 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

238 S.W.3d 708 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Dab
238 S.W.3d 708 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)