Coleman v. State
908 S.W.2d 187, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1775, 1995 WL 619845
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion [188]*188court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 908 S.W.2d 187, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1775, 1995 WL 619845 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
908 S.W.2d 187 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.