Coleman v. State
877 S.W.2d 215, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 1994 WL 240968
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm. We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).
We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coleman v. State, 877 S.W.2d 215, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 905, 1994 WL 240968 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
877 S.W.2d 215 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.