Coleman v. State

587 So. 2d 1237, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 50273
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coleman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 552 So. 2d 156
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 15, 1991·No. CR 89-863·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

BOWEN, Judge.

The dismissal of Coleman’s petition for post-conviction relief was reversed and the cause was remanded for further action in the trial court. Coleman v. State, 571 So.2d 1289 (Ala.Cr.App.1990). On remand, the circuit court entered a written order, wherein that court found “no basis” for the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea convictions of second degree robbery and fraudulent use of a credit card.

The appellant, although given adequate time to file a brief in response to the supplemental record, has failed to do so.

The judgment of the circuit court denying the appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed for the reasons stated in the January 7, 1991, order of the circuit court.

OPINION EXTENDED;

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coleman v. State, 587 So. 2d 1237, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 50273 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

587 So. 2d 1237 (Coleman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coleman v. State
571 So. 2d 1289 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)