Coleman v. State
This text of 587 So. 2d 1237 (Coleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON RETURN TO REMAND
The dismissal of Coleman’s petition for post-conviction relief was reversed and the cause was remanded for further action in the trial court. Coleman v. State, 571 So.2d 1289 (Ala.Cr.App.1990). On remand, the circuit court entered a written order, wherein that court found “no basis” for the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea convictions of second degree robbery and fraudulent use of a credit card.
The appellant, although given adequate time to file a brief in response to the supplemental record, has failed to do so.
The judgment of the circuit court denying the appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief is affirmed for the reasons stated in the January 7, 1991, order of the circuit court.
OPINION EXTENDED;
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 1237, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, 1991 WL 50273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.