Coleman v. Coleman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coleman v. Coleman

895 So. 2d 539, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, 2005 WL 596956

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 2005

DocketNo. 1D04-3992

StatusPublished

This text of 895 So. 2d 539 (Coleman v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coleman v. Coleman, 895 So. 2d 539, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, 2005 WL 596956 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. Finding insufficient evidence which would lead a “reasonable person to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of domestic violence,” we reverse. See Gustafson v. Mauck, 743 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (citing section 741.30(1), Florida Statutes (1997)).

WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. Finding insufficient evidence which would lead a “reasonable person to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of becoming a victim of domestic violence,” we reverse. See Gustafson v. Mauck, 743 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (citing section 741.30(1), Florida Statutes (1997)).

WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

895 So. 2d 539, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, 2005 WL 596956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coleman-v-coleman-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack