Coleman-Bey v. Dove

Opinion

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0543n.06 Filed: August 1, 2006

No. 05-5669

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MONROE L. COLEMAN-BEY, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN v. ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) DAN DOVE, et al., ) OPINION ) Defendants-Appellees. )

BEFORE: DAUGHTERY and COOK, Circuit Judges; COLLIER, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the

record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s brief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose

would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court

upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.

* The Honorable Curtis L. Collier, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.