Coleman-Bey v. Dove

Sixth Circuit

Coleman-Bey v. Dove

191 F. App'x 397

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2006·No. No. 05-5669·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s bl'ief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s bl'ief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.

Coleman-Bey v. Dove, 191 F. App'x 397 (6th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

191 F. App'x 397 (Coleman-Bey v. Dove) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related