Cole v. Brandle

11 A.2d 255, 127 N.J. Eq. 31, 129 A.L.R. 1250, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1940·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

*41 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Eielder in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trencharb, Case, Bobine, Persicie, Porter, Heteielb, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Donges, Heher, Eaeeerty, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole v. Brandle, 11 A.2d 255, 127 N.J. Eq. 31, 129 A.L.R. 1250, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 580 (N.J. 1940).

11 A.2d 255 (Cole v. Brandle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Millman
45 A.3d 332 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)
Keezer v. State
9 N.J. Tax 264 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1987)
Lavin v. Hackensack Bd. of Ed.
447 A.2d 516 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Yacker v. Weiner
263 A.2d 188 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
United States v. Jacobs
155 F. Supp. 182 (D. New Jersey, 1957)
Miller v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, Hudson County
91 A.2d 729 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Krechmer v. Cohen
7 F.R.D. 346 (S.D. New York, 1947)
Wendt v. Bergen Savings Bank
25 A.2d 511 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)