Colby v. State

675 So. 2d 1025, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780, 1996 WL 346974
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 1996
DocketNos. 95-1753, 95-1757, 95-2517 and 95-2883
StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 1025 (Colby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colby v. State, 675 So. 2d 1025, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780, 1996 WL 346974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PARIENTE, Judge.

In this certiorari proceeding, petitioners seek review of the circuit court’s denial of their petitions for writs of prohibition following the county court’s denial of their motions to dismiss their DUI charges on grounds of double jeopardy. Our standard of review is a limited one. See Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995). We deny the petition because the double jeopardy clause does not preclude DUI prosecution of offenders who previously had their driving privileges suspended pursuant to section 322.2615, Florida Statutes (1995). See State v. Henn, 662 So.2d 1391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

CERTIORARI DENIED.

STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs
658 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
State v. Henn
662 So. 2d 1391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 1025, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780, 1996 WL 346974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colby-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.