Coker v. Mitchell

535 S.W.2d 175, 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 262, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 205
Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1976·No. B-5784·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Civil Appeals (531 S.W.2d 204) has properly followed the rule of Smith v. Columbian Carbon Co., 145 Tex. 478, 198 S.W.2d 727 (1947), and allowed a non-suit sought in the trial court by the plaintiffs *176 prior to announcement by the judge in open court that defendant’s motion for instructed verdict would be granted. Under the rule in effect when this case was tried and when the Court of Civil Appeals opinion was written, the plaintiffs had the right to take the non-suit even though all parties had closed the presentation of evidence and the judge had informed them in chambers of his intention to grant the defendant’s motion. The application is therefore refused, no reversible error. It should be noted that Rule 164, Tex.Rules Civ.Proe., as amended January 1, 1976, now allows plaintiff the right to a non-suit only until his own case-in-chief is rested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coker v. Mitchell, 535 S.W.2d 175, 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 262, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 205 (Tex. 1976).

535 S.W.2d 175 (Coker v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Commercial Corp. v. Datapoint Corp.
774 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
O'BRIEN v. Stanzel
603 S.W.2d 826 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Musick v. Musick
590 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Stanzel v. O'Brien
584 S.W.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Mainland Savings Ass'n v. Wilson
545 S.W.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)