Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 384

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 25, 1955

DocketNo. 59100; protests 48801-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 384 (Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 384 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices consists of alabaster beads the same as those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and the items marked “B” consist of white beads similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices consists of alabaster beads the same as those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and the items marked “B” consist of white beads similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-rosenberger-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack