Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 384
United States Customs Court·Decided May 25, 1955·No. No. 59100; protests 48801-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices consists of alabaster beads the same as those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and the items marked “B” consist of white beads similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 384 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 384 (Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
13 Cust. Ct. 50 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)
Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
17 Cust. Ct. 56 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)