Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 681

United States Customs Court·Decided May 18, 1961·No. Reap. Dec. 10000; Entry No. 722977, etc.·Published

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, were called for hearing, they were ordered submitted on the official papers.

[682]*682An examination of the official papers discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, were called for hearing, they were ordered submitted on the official papers.

[682]*682An examination of the official papers discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 681 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 681 (Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.