Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 614
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1960
DocketReap. Dec. 9635; Entry Nos. 841321/2; 841321/1
StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 614 (Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohn Hall Marx Co. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 614 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The two appeals for reappraisement, listed above, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals to reappraisement noted above are the same in all material respects as the issues' in the ease of United States v. S. Shamash & Sons Inc., A.R.D. 41, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the pongee silk involved herein at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was 750 per yard, packed, and that the price for home consumption was no higher.
[615]*615IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the eases may be deemed submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such statutory value is 75 cents per yard, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Cust. Ct. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-hall-marx-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.