Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro

77 N.C. 2

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 77 N.C. 2 (Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro, 77 N.C. 2 (N.C. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Eeade, J.

If the defendants have an unlawful ordinance1, and have arrested and fined the plaintiffs, as they allege, the-plaintiffs have complete redress in an action for damages.. And as often as the arrest may be repeated they have the-, like redress ; but we are aware of no principle or precedent, for the interposition of a Court of Equity in such eases.

The injuution is dissolved and the case dismissed.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eeade, J.

If the defendants have an unlawful ordinance1, and have arrested and fined the plaintiffs, as they allege, the-plaintiffs have complete redress in an action for damages.. And as often as the arrest may be repeated they have the-, like redress ; but we are aware of no principle or precedent, for the interposition of a Court of Equity in such eases.

The injuution is dissolved and the case dismissed.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 N.C. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-commissioners-of-goldsboro-nc-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack