Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro
77 N.C. 2
Opinion
If the defendants have an unlawful ordinance1, and have arrested and fined the plaintiffs, as they allege, the-plaintiffs have complete redress in an action for damages.. And as often as the arrest may be repeated they have the-, like redress ; but we are aware of no principle or precedent, for the interposition of a Court of Equity in such eases.
The injuution is dissolved and the case dismissed.
Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro, 77 N.C. 2 (N.C. 1877).
77 N.C. 2 (Cohen v. Commissioners of Goldsboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SS Kresge Company v. Davis
178 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
Gore v. Humphries
135 S.E. 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Thompson v. Town of Lumberton
108 S.E. 722 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
State Ex Relator McNamara v. Clark
187 S.W. 760 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Le Blanc v. City of New Orleans
70 So. 212 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Kelly v. Conner
122 Tenn. 339 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1909)
City of Tyler v. Story
97 S.W. 573 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Davis & Farnum Mfg. Co. v. City of Los Angeles
115 F. 537 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1902)
Paulk v. Mayor of Sycamore
41 L.R.A. 772 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Scott v. . Smith
28 S.E. 64 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
M. Golden & Co. v. City of Guthrie
1895 OK 15 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1895)
Poyer v. Village of Des Plaines
13 N.E. 819 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Torpedo Co. v. Borough of Clarendon
19 F. 231 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1884)