Cohen v. Burger
769 So. 2d 466, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13203, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2453
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1107·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 766.102, Fla. Stat. (1997) (requiring that evidence of prevailing professional standard of care for a given health care provider be that of a “similar health care provider” as defined in the statute); see also Sims v. Helms, 345 So.2d 721 (Fla.1977); Borne v. Lawnwood Regional Med. Ctr., 767 So.2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Robbins v. Newhall, 692 So.2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (expert medical evidence is required to support a claim for medical malpractice).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohen v. Burger, 769 So. 2d 466, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13203, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
769 So. 2d 466 (Cohen v. Burger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fittipaldi USA, Inc. v. Castroneves
905 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
ANESTHESIOLOGY CARE CONSULTANTS v. Kretzer
802 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)