Cohen v. Burger

769 So. 2d 466, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13203, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-1107
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 769 So. 2d 466 (Cohen v. Burger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Burger, 769 So. 2d 466, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13203, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 766.102, Fla. Stat. (1997) (requiring that evidence of prevailing professional standard of care for a given health care provider be that of a “similar health care provider” as defined in the statute); see also Sims v. Helms, 345 So.2d 721 (Fla.1977); Borne v. Lawnwood Regional Med. Ctr., 767 So.2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Robbins v. Newhall, 692 So.2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (expert medical evidence is required to support a claim for medical malpractice).

WARNER, C.J, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fittipaldi USA, Inc. v. Castroneves
905 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
ANESTHESIOLOGY CARE CONSULTANTS v. Kretzer
802 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
769 So. 2d 466, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13203, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-burger-fladistctapp-2000.