Cogley v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cogley v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

884 N.E.2d 1292, 379 Ill. App. 3d 957, 319 Ill. Dec. 47, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 205

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 13, 2008

Docket2-05-1198

StatusPublished

This text of 884 N.E.2d 1292 (Cogley v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cogley v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., 884 N.E.2d 1292, 379 Ill. App. 3d 957, 319 Ill. Dec. 47, 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 205 (Ill. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

JUSTICE McLAREN

delivered the opinion of the court:

The supreme court, in the exercise of its supervisory authority, directed this court to vacate its decision in Cogley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 368 Ill. App. 3d 91 (2006), and to reconsider our judgment in light of Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 226 Ill. 2d 307 (2007). We hereby vacate our decision.

The parties have moved to dismiss the appeal by agreement. We therefore dismiss this appeal and will not reconsider our decision in light of Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 226 Ill. 2d 307 (2007).

Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, “[pllaintiff s complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to settlement with each party to bear its own costs of litigation, and this matter is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of jurisdiction as to the settlement only.”

Appellate court judgment vacated and appeal dismissed; cause remanded.

BYRNE, EJ., and BOWMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI